The pygmies are on the march and a catfight is coming!
The CIA’s operational impact in Afghanistan is marginally relevant, according to a report by the senior US military intelligence official in the country.
The report said US intelligence officials and analysts were “ignorant of local economics and landowners, hazy about who the power-brokers are and how they might be influenced, incurious about the correlations between various development projects … and disengaged from people in the best position to find answers.”
Even this irrelevancy seems like small beer compared to the agency’s inability to find Osama bin Laden or its hiring of a double agent Jordanian suicide bomber.
On the other hand, the Pentagon’s had 100,000 troops and 100,000 contractors in Afghanistan, and can’t say with a straight face that they’re doing much better against the Taliban or corruption.
The Afpak policy remains one of total confusion: are we after al-Qaeda, which isn’t in Afghanistan? are we propping up a corrupt government that rigged the last election? are we preparing to invade Pakistan, where al-Qaeda and the Taliban actually operate? how do we sustain economic development that’s not wholly dependent on the drug trade? how much longer will we be there?
Gorilla thinks: “We need a full brain scan before the next US bound flight of fancy!”