Barney Frank wants to abolish Fannie and Freddie, but doesn’t have much to say about what happens to all those underwater mortgages, now that the US government backs 90 percent of the housing market…
It’s a classic politician’s dodge: promise radical change without thinking through the consequences of your proposals.
Fannie and Freddie didn’t create the housing bubble, Alan Greenspan deserves the credit for that.
The vast majority of bad loans were made by the private sector, which operated on the assumption that house prices could only go up.
The regulatory agencies, in particular the Fed, did absolutely nothing to prick the bubble.
The US government rewarded this moral hazard by bailing out the banks and other financial institutions that made these dreadful decisions.
If you really want to reform the housing market, while no longer encouraging home ownership as an end unto itself, there are lots of ways to go, none of which have the slightest chance of passing in the US Congress:
1) Eliminate the home mortgage interest deduction: this mainly benefits the wealthiest taxpayers and has the effect of keeping house prices at least 25% higher than they should be.
2) Allow bankruptcy judges to reduce principal owed: this will eliminate extend and pretend, while forcing the banks to start recognizing and dealing with losses.
3) Cap the amount of second mortgages at 40% of homeowner’s equity.
4) Institute a 10% minimum down payment across the board and cap house payments at a maximum of 30% of income: potential homeowners need to demonstrate that they can afford their homes.
5) Institute a 10% minimum stake for those who securitize mortgages: the banks and mortgage servicers need to demonstrate that they have as much “skin in the game” as the customers they’re lending to and/or defrauding.
These would change the housing market as we know it by making houses much more affordable and potential homeowners much more able to afford their houses.
Gorilla says: “When everyone knows the government won’t bail them out, there might be a chance for economics to work!”